Censorship in Turkey - Wikipedia. Turkey. Censorship in Turkey is regulated by domestic and international legislation, the latter (in theory) taking precedence over domestic law, according to Article 9. Constitution of Turkey (so amended in 2. By some accounts, Turkey currently accounts for one- third of all journalists imprisoned around the world. Journalists faced unprecedented legal obstacles as the courts restricted reporting on corruption and national security issues. The authorities also continued to aggressively use the penal code, criminal defamation laws, and the antiterrorism law to crack down on journalists and media outlets. Verbal attacks on journalists by senior politicians—including Recep Tayyip Erdo. Meanwhile, the government continued to use the financial and other leverage it holds over media owners to influence coverage of politically sensitive issues. Several dozen journalists, including prominent columnists, lost their jobs as a result of such pressure during the year, and those who remained had to operate in a climate of increasing self- censorship and media polarization. On 1. 5 February 1. Ottoman Empire issued law governing printing houses (.
![]() Technology Assets interviews and news for IT professionals in Canada. Latest breaking news, including politics, crime and celebrity. Find stories, updates and expert opinion. The latest news articles from Billboard Magazine, including reviews, business, pop, hip-hop, rock, dance, country and more.If no objection was made, the Sultanate would then inspect them. Without censure from the Sultan books could not be legally issued. The Press Law changed, sentences and fines were increased. Several newspapers were ordered shut, including the dailies Ulus (unlimited ban), H. In April 1. 96. 0, a so- called investigation commission (. It was given the power to confiscate publications, close papers and printing houses. Anyone not following the decisions of the commission were subject to imprisonment, between one and three years. During the 1. 98. Kurdish issue), and the role of the military in politics risked reprisal. For example, publisher Fatih Tas was prosecuted in 2. Article 8 at Istanbul State Security Court for translating and publishing writings by Noam Chomsky, summarizing the history of human rights violations in southeast Turkey; he was acquitted, however, in February 2. Those who resist do so at their own risk. All of these have tended to steer clear of covering the demonstrations. Kemal Kilicdaroglu, head of the Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi (CHP) party, said 6. We are now facing a new period where the media is controlled by the government and the police and where most media bosses take orders from political authorities.” The government says most of the imprisoned journalists have been detained for serious crimes, like membership in an armed terrorist group, that are not related to journalism. Bianet recorded the censorship of 1. Twitter accounts, 1. Several journalists and editors are tried for being allegedly members of unlawful organisations, linked to either Kurds or the G. In 2. 01. 5 Cumhuriyet daily and Do. On the date of Bianet's publication, 6. PM, now- President Recep Tayyip Erdo. The European Court of Human Rights condemned Turkey for violation of the freedom of expression in the Abdurrahman Dilipak case (Sledgehammer investigation). The Supreme Electoral Council ordered 6. June 2. 01. 5 election before the end of the publishing ban. Attack to media freedom went far beyond the AKP interim government period. The January 2. 01. Bianet's report confirmed this alarming trend, underlining that the whole 2. In November 2. 01. Can D. Investigation against the two journalists were launched after the newspaper documented the transfer of weapons from Turkey to Syria in trucks of the National Intelligence Organization previously involved in the M. Mustafa Cambaz, a photojournalist working for the daily Yeni Safak was killed during the coup. Turkish soldiers attempting to overthrow the government took control of several newsrooms, including the Ankara- based headquarter of the state broadcaster TRT. They also forced a TV channel's anchor to read a statement at gunpoint while the member of the editorial board were held hostage and threatened. Also, soldiers seized the offices in Istanbul of Do. During the coup's night, in the streets of Istanbul, a photojournalist working for Hurriyet and the Associated Press was assaulted by civilians that were demonstrating against the coup. On July 1. 9, the Turkish Radio and Television Supreme Council decided to revoke the licence of 2. TV channels and radio stations for being allegedly connected to the G. Also, following the decision of declaring the state of emergency for three months taken on 2. July. The measures within the regime of emergency include the possibility to ban printing, copying, publishing and distributing newspapers, magazines, books and leaflets. In has never been an easy country for journalists, but I think today it has reached its lowest point and is experiencing unprecedented repression. Expressions of non- violent opinion are safeguarded by Article 1. European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, ratified by Turkey in 1. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, signed by Turkey in 2. Turkish Criminal Code provides for criminal defamation of the Head of the State. June 2. 01. 6. 2. Criminal Code is increasingly being enforced as well, imposing a “press silence” (Yay. Violating this norm can lead up to three years of detention. As to the Internet, the relevant Law is Law No. Charges were brought in more than 6. Although only few persons were convicted, trials under Art. An investigation started upon those academics under charges of “terrorism propaganda”, “incitement to hatred and enmity” and for “insulting the State” under Article No. Turkish Criminal Code. In 1. 99. 9 the mayor of Istanbul and current president Recep Tayyip Erdogan was sentenced to 1. Article 3. 12 for reading a few lines from a poem that had been authorized by the Ministry of Education for use in schools, and consequently had to resign. Under the revised text, incitement can only be punished if it presents . None of the other laws had been amended or repealed as of 2. They often result in fines and jail terms. Bianet counted 1. It carries a minimum sentence of 7,5 years. According to the OSCE, most of 2. June 2. 01. 4 had been charged or condemned based on Art. Article 8. 1 of the Political Parties Law (imposed by the military junta in 1. Turkish in their written material or at any formal or public meetings. This law is strictly enforced. The European Court of Human Rights has in multiple occasions found the law to amount to censorship and breach of freedom of expression. Thereafter, university students began a campaign for optional courses in Kurdish to be put on the university curriculum, triggering more than 1,0. Turkey during December and January 2. Educational programmes teaching the Kurdish language are not allowed. The Turkish Public Television (TRT) has continued broadcasting in five languages including Kurdish. However, the duration and scope of TRT's national broadcasts in five languages is very limited. No private broadcaster at national level has applied for broadcasting in languages other than Turkish since the enactment of the 2. Yet, state secrets that may harm national security, economic interests, state investigations, or intelligence activity, or that “violate the private life of the individual,” are exempt from requests. This has made accessing official information particularly difficult. Antiterrorism regulations were tweaked so that publication of statements of illegal groups would only be a crime if the statement included coercion, violence, or genuine threats. Yet, the reform was deemed as not reaching international human rights standards, since it did not touch upon problematic norms such as the Articles 1. Penal Code. Consequently, several journalists were released from jail, pending trial. A September 2. 01. Law no. 5. 65. 1 had also allowed T. It also made it a crime, punished with up to 9 years in prison, to acquire or publish information on M. The transfer of executive powers to the Information and Communication Technologies Authority eliminated ministerial oversight of internet blocking orders as part of a wider set of reforms to introduce an executive presidency. Of these, several concern Article 1. Convention, on freedom of expression. The Tan. Turkey case (no. Yeni Politika daily published in 1. Prevention of Terrorism Act or under Article 3. Criminal Code. The Turkish government struck a friendly settlement with Necati Tan. Turkey case (no. 5. Rag. The newspaper was banned from the provinces of south- east Anatolia (OHAL) in which a state of emergency had been declared on 7 May 1. The ECHR struck the decision as unmotivated, arbitrary, and lacking a mechanism of judicial appeal. Turkey case (no. 1. Yedinci G. The paper was also temporarily closed down. The ECHR condemned Turkey in 2. Turkey cases (2. 00. Turkish citizens, either owners or directors and journalists of four daily newspapers (. The applicants were also criminally prosecuted. The ECHR in 2. 00. From the beginning of the . The paper remained closed from 1. These facts were the bases for the . Turkey case before the ECt. HR. Concerning the police operation at the . Turkey (2. 01. 0): Dink was a Turkish- Armenian journalist writing for the newspaper Agos. Between 2. 00. 3 and 2. Turkish citizens with Armenian origins. He was charged under Article 3. This verdict did not respect the principle, stated in the official comment to the 2. Article 3. 01, that a single word or expression cannot justify the resort to criminal law. The European Strasbourg Court (ECt. HR) considered the verdict lacking of any “pressing social need” and - together with the authorities. Turkey (2. 01. 3). Google Sites”, defamation, the usage of disproportionate measures and the need for restrictions to be prescribed by law. Attacks and threats against journalists. Soon after the pro- Kurdish press had started to publish the first daily newspaper by the name of . Hardly any of them has been clarified or resulted in sanctions for the assailants. The list of names of distributors of . Most prominent among the victims is Hrant Dink, killed in 2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
August 2017
Categories |